The 2-Minute Rule for h4831sc load data
The 2-Minute Rule for h4831sc load data
Blog Article
I'm a true lover with the H4831 powder. I get wonderful velocity and accuracy away from any caliber I have attempted it in. In the twenty five-06 up on the 338 it is actually my check out powder of alternative. I consider every type of powders when working up loads, though the H4831 always appears to come out on major for accuracy and velocity when the situation is in the 06 class or much larger.
H4831 will perform within the Swift but not real perfectly. You can never ever obtain the pressures you need for consistency While using the .223. 760, or H414 might be far better but for some motive I ain't the greatest admirer of most ball powders.
What is actually the real difference? Compression. With no Severe/hefty compression affiliated with the very long grain 7828, the stress curve was altered and the load fell aside.
We’d like to ensure that you’re eighteen a long time of age or older prior to permitting you to shop our site. Are you eighteen yrs of age or older?
The only difference as I are aware of it is that the SC was meant to perform by powder measures far better (which it does). The for a longer period grains don't feed properly at all in a few steps. Thats my 02 :grin:
Because there doesn't seem like any "official" Load Data to choose from for this Load, can a number of you offer a place to begin with this combination and matters to think about when Doing work this Load up?
Nampa, Idaho In my practical experience the sole authentic distinction is that the shortcut meters greater through reloading products. Once It truly is loaded theres no purposeful variance. I've listened to which the shortcut might have a little little bit more rapidly melt away price but it seems insignificant.
Like claimed earlier mentioned, exact same stuff. All that is different is the size of your kernels. I did listen to somewhere that they are going to only make the SC in the future. I don't know if that is definitely real or not but would sound right to me. I use SC due to the fact which h4831 vs h4831sc is what I found in the eight lb jug and it works.
At this time working with IMR 4831 inside a 300WSM, and see the H4831sc is a well-liked option for this caliber and yields somewhat more velocity. Besides it currently being limited Minimize, precisely what is the h4831sc load data main difference in these two powders, and should I switch to H4831sc?
Why would I mention this? What precisely is my place? I'm undecided that there's a actual legitimate place apart from precisely what is well-liked with most has not been well known with me in any respect in these instances. Do I just Use a powder jinx or anything? Only to teach you how mad I really am, tomorrow I am array tests a mates new .
As with the 4831 vs 4831SC, They may be the exact same/equivalent powder cept for grain dimension. Load data is interchangeable.
It is most likely that no additional dialogue is necessary, through which situation we suggest beginning a new thread. If having said that you really feel your response is required you may continue to accomplish that.
I know the H4831SC offers a much better load density But I think I've enough place in my situation for the traditional H4831.
I sawed 1 in fifty percent to view how thick the jackets ended up, and they had been very easily two times as thick being a 50-grain hollow position was. Ditto for that sixty four-grain Electric power Place, as these bullets are crafted for deer, not prairie pet dogs or woodchucks. You now know everything I know h4831sc about the 22-250 and gradual-burning powders, and I don't know something in any respect regarding the 223. I question that you're going to get everywhere with that cartridge and 4831, but let us know how it goes.